| The exhibition I never curated My project is concerned with documenting my experiences as an Independent Curator based in Australia. I probably started this project about a year ago (2004). To date it seems to revolve around the city, apartment and self I live in. I’m primarily interested in developing curatorial projects that challenge and renegotiate traditional curatorial paradigms, especially didactic museums and preordained gallery models. |
|
14.5.09 Filed under: waking, eating and sleeping | Posted by Louise Rollman | 14.5.09 10:25 AM ![]() PJ Hickman, Basic Attitudes (Box Sets Standard and Embossed Editions), 2008., originally uploaded by mxccuba. Where was everyone? At PJ Hickman’s Metro Arts opening last night I didn’t see a single person I know. Weird. Nonetheless, extending on the Sophie Gannon exhibition mid-last year, there’s a number of insert: [AN ARTIST’S NAME] and artists from the Venice Biennale, such as Vernon Ah Kee. The works evoke a portrait of the artists, an image of their works, the broader art world and its institutionalised systems. There’s also multiple new works, or paintings-as-administration. 20.4.09 Filed under: waking, eating and sleeping | Posted by Louise Rollman | 20.4.09 09:12 AM I’ve wanted to see the Sydney Dance Company since forever. It seemed that I always saw the marketing material too late and as a consequence missed their performances. So, needless to say, I was very much looking forward to seeing 360º. Finally. And thankfully it delivered fully toned physique and physicality, which I love. Although, curiously I witnessed some of the palest bodies I’ve ever seen (particularly in Australia). Initially, there was some sensory overload (never thought I’d say that about anything, ever) and simultaneously, slow and meandering. Aside from some early twittering, cliqued movements (is contemporary dance still suffering a psychofrenic crisis?) and being distracted by such thoughts, my experience gradually settled into a better rhythm and became total. The male ensemble and the waves acts/movements produced some beautiful and compelling moving images. There were even some slippery yoga tiger moves and the pop light/music was perhaps the most pure. 13.4.09 Filed under: waking, eating and sleeping | Posted by Louise Rollman | 13.4.09 01:40 AM How awesome is Mary and Max? It’s like the best Australian (and New York I suppose) film I can remember seeing in ages. And even better that it’s claymation, which also manages to make Australian kitsch digestible. There are so many great details: Max’s totally grotesque recipes; The ‘life be in it’ stamped to the crotch of Grandpa’s buggy-smugglers; Max’s problem-solving; Mary’s dream of some day marrying Earl Grey; Max’s anxiety attacks; Philip Seymour-Hoffman pronouncing Mary’s full name as he begins to type each letter. His voice was so familiar. It wasn’t until the end when I thought about it that I realised, oh it’s Seymour-Hoffman. Actually, the voices of the superior cast really cares for and shapes these characters so convincingly. It’s unfortunate that the bittersweet is being described as bleak. Particularly when it was a relationship and tale that ultimately stumbled upon such good fortune. 3.4.09 Filed under: my own private neon oasis | Posted by Louise Rollman | 3.4.09 10:45 AM ![]() Erzan Adam, 'Naked as We Were', 2008. Fabric 59 x 59 x 142 cm. Photo: D. Eckersley., originally uploaded by mxccuba. Illness aside we managed to get out and about a little. How could I possibly stand not seeing the galleries: ‘Manifold’ at the Substation, the Singapore Art Museum (Damian’s sneaky photo posted above) including ‘@ home abroad’ at the new, diagonally adjacent 8Q; Post-Museum, and a very brief glimpse of Little India, and the opening of Betty Susiarjo’s ‘Someday We Will Know’ (images previously posted) at Lasalle on our way to the airport. Noting that ICA and/or Lasalle haven’t updated their website for some time, they don’t list their opening hours, didn’t respond to my email query, appeared to have other exhibitions on (?), but I had to learn about the opening from the sitter at ‘Manifold’. 2.4.09 Filed under: waking, eating and sleeping | Posted by Louise Rollman | 2.4.09 11:02 AM
Filed under: my own private neon oasis | Posted by Louise Rollman | 2.4.09 10:32 AM We’ve been talking about spending some weekends in Asia for a while. A discussion that spawned the DH boys’ one-night mantra: kebab, passport, Bali. But thanks to an invitation for Damian to speak at the Malaysian Institute of Architects Conference, we’d be spending this first weekend away in Kuching, Sarawawak, northern Borneo. 1.4.09 Filed under: my own private neon oasis | Posted by Louise Rollman | 1.4.09 10:24 PM 16.3.09 Filed under: my own private neon oasis | Posted by Louise Rollman | 16.3.09 02:39 AM And when you’ve seen Tokyo-Ga, a documentary about Japanese director Ozu, then obviously you want to know more about Ozu - the emphatic statement in The Elegance of the Hedgehog that compelled us to find the documentary. In addition we specifically wanted to see The Munekata Sisters, but settled for revisiting Tokyo Story and others. 9.3.09 Filed under: waking, eating and sleeping | Posted by Louise Rollman | 9.3.09 11:59 AM Over the weekend, the idea – I must remember to start writing that review Monday, kept popping into my head. Then today, why not start differently - looking at blogs I’ve been meaning to for months. So, I’ve been sucked into a wonderful vortex, before a Tea Master lunch with the boy. 23.2.09 Filed under: Cooling Centre: Post ISCP | Posted by Louise Rollman | 23.2.09 10:56 PM With Archie trying to spot other Indigenous people and scanning maps for Indigenous names, I visited the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (TMAG). I normally don’t pay any attention to works I dislike and I certainly haven’t written about them, but I’ve been preoccupied with The Conciliation. I suspect it’s the art-equivalent of watching a car crash. In addition to the accompanying works on paper, or studies I suppose of connected Indigenous Tasmanians, showing for example Woureddy’s resplendent ochre dusted dreadlocks; what’s particularly compelling is that The Conciliation very clearly depicts Indigenous Tasmanians not amidst flora and fauna, but rather their distinct identities. 17.2.09 Filed under: The exhibition I never curated | Posted by Louise Rollman | 17.2.09 10:57 PM Filed under: Cooling Centre: Post ISCP | Posted by Louise Rollman | 17.2.09 10:55 PM
Filed under: waking, eating and sleeping | Posted by Louise Rollman | 17.2.09 9:01 PM Aside from the obligatory stops: Franklin River, Cradle Mountain and Freycinet. I’d discovered Damian was seriously entertaining the idea of a possible alternative: planning our entire trip around vegetarian food. He’d found an alarmist with a very limited list; as-in more dire than a vegetarian in Cuba. While it’s a curious and completely understandable approach, thankfully it was unnecessary (much like the 9 day canoe trip down the Franklin). However, more surprising was discovering that restaurants tend to close early in Tasmania, especially in Hobart’s city centre. 16.2.09 Filed under: Cooling Centre: Post ISCP | Posted by Louise Rollman | 16.2.09 8:56 PM Day #2 of our whirlwind tour of Tasmania was all about Cradle Mountain. When we arrived it was raining, misty and below 11° (Celsius). After whining a bit, we set off on the Dove Lake circuit and were snap-happy and captivated within moments. 15.2.09 Filed under: Cooling Centre: Post ISCP | Posted by Louise Rollman | 15.2.09 8:36 PM ![]() Peter Dombrovski, Morning Mist, Rock Island Bend, Franklin River (1979)., originally uploaded by mxccuba. How could we not pay our respects to the Franklin. It has been considered the last wild river and is synonymous with one of, if not the largest Australian conservation battles (and part of a broader context for the subtle political undertones in the exhibition). 14.2.09 Filed under: Cooling Centre: Post ISCP | Posted by Louise Rollman | 14.2.09 8:29 PM Hobart reminded Archie and I of Toowoomba, while Hobart and Launceston reminded Damian of Newtown during the nineties. The exhibition is in a large part about this experience - as a kind of constant tourist. When do we ever encounter a place in isolation to the landscapes we’ve experienced previously? It usually takes some time before a place develops its own identity independent of other spaces. 13.2.09 Filed under: Cooling Centre: Post ISCP | Posted by Louise Rollman | 13.2.09 10:55 PM 6.2.09 Filed under: Cooling Centre: Post ISCP | Posted by Louise Rollman | 6.2.09 10:47 PM For months I’ve been increasingly preoccupied with the forthcoming exhibition Colliding Islands. All the little details: venue/context, freight, writing, finalising the catalogue, triple-checking details. My sleep was out of whack due to lingering grammatical questions: an overused comma in my predictably long sentences. The usual process that inevitably peaks and then wanes post-opening. Essentially, it’s a kind of landscape exhibition. Which is humorous to me, because if someone had told me that I’d be curating a ‘landscape’ exhibition 18-months ago, in my mind - I would have reached over and slapped them. But I think this coupled with a gradual consideration of the project has ultimately led to a richer interpretation/s. The project has come about through a series of studio situations and visits, where there was a noticeable subsistence of landscapes, either overtly or more subtle ideas about landscape. Particularly, American artists opposed to occupation in Iraq and confounded by the enforced rules of political and military spaces in the US. Grappling with this identity conflict while traversing sedition and managing self-censorship. Landscapes imbued with politics. It’s a minefield. From an outsider’s perspective, headlines regarding Iraq would be missing from US newspapers; instead there was a persistent radio advertisement to recruit for the CIA. What are our social responsibilities in this global context? As an Australian, how do we participate? How can we when we’re still reconciling inherited ideological differences here? Can Indigenous Camping lend it self to site-specific models? Is there a new kind of landscape genre - post-site-specificity or at least a revised way of considering the genre? More broadly, the project acknowledges that the screen makes it possible to encounter other spaces and allows for a distorted picturesque. Namely, our experience and perspective of Los Angeles is fashion and fiction, populated by celebrities. Los Angeles, and its realities are questionable. We expect it to be a vacuous husk that can be endlessly overlaid with new fictions. Rather than permanent migration post-WII or a nostalgic, bittersweet memory, the project is more concerned with being briefly and continuously displaced, both physically and psychologically, and in particular via digital communications. We’re bombarded and seduced, in a similar way to advertising, by different spaces. How do we reconcile these colliding spaces? Perhaps it’s easy to think of landscape exhibitions as quaint, and not typically relevant to contemporary contexts. They’re often dragged out of storage and installed without re-defining their relevance to the contemporary moment. As individuals and islands we knock about and transfer (no man is an island). The responsibilities of global citizens demands that one can extend one’s self to act beyond the immediate situation. In effect, burst the bubble. 20.1.09 Filed under: Curating the City | Posted by Louise Rollman | 20.1.09 08:42 AM “Oh, you’re a curator at ‘the gallery? No, I said I’m an independent curator.” The responses are invariably… “I didn’t realise there were other galleries? Or, I don’t understand your role, what is it that you do?” Which, if not actually asked, infers: how do you make a living and what is your value? It was so nice in New York (in fact, almost anywhere else) I could be talking with my driver, who’d respond, “Oh, well this is the place. There are so many galleries, have you been to this gallery” or exhibition, or work, I really liked blah, blah. The conversations were so easy; I never had to start from the beginning. Here, whether layperson or artist, I often have to start from the dawn of time and it can be so difficult to jump start this kind of conversation. It’s forced me to spend a lot of time essentially advocating for my profession. But sometimes it is interesting to be asked such seemingly obvious questions. Namely, what is an exhibition? What is an exhibition’s value? So a while back, months ago, I wrote a brief do-it-yourself guide. The publication format sits somewhere between a designed zine and a pamphlet. It explores exhibition models or exhibition types that contemporary and independent exhibition makers utilise as materials that are continually transformed. The approaches described are by no means shiny-new-fangled practices and I’d imagine the guide offers little new information for those in the biz. However, it does divert from prescriptive definitions of exhibitions, contained by a dedicated venue with white walls. Just as artists employ genre-breaking approaches to making, associated roles also blur and oscillate: artist-as-curator, curator as collaborator and collector as sponsor. For ages I’d been reluctant about the idea, because I’d considered the micro text and macro images of guidebooks a bit silly really, but I’ve gradually realised that they can be quite useful references, a quick resource for succinct on-point information. By popular demand, this edition also contains an ‘insert’ that lists and locates, with an accompanying map, preferred New York galleries and locations of interest; which is great for me, because I won’t have to continually search for that list anymore. Ultimately, Nomads & Residents presents a context for my regular encounters in the hope of jump starting that inevitable conversation, to rectify an imbalance. Or at least, reassure others (and myself) of the inherent values of exhibition making and in a way, how to consider paradigm shifting exhibitions. 4.11.08 Filed under: waking, eating and sleeping | Posted by Louise Rollman | 4.11.08 05:26 AM
14.10.08 Filed under: waking, eating and sleeping | Posted by Louise Rollman | 14.10.08 05:25 AM
I was excited and even a little bit scared – hoping I’d make it, rather than fall in a heap before the finish line. As many of my friends and colleagues know, last year my idea was pink cupcakes for a pink breakfast, but this year I thought I’d up the anti and participate in my first triathlon. After continually writing for a couple of months I was sick, not even swimming and needed a new kind of kick-start. So, why not sign up for a triathlon. And besides, I figured it wouldn’t matter if I collapsed, passed out, or whatever, because it was all about raising funds in aid of the National Breast Cancer Foundation. So, I spent the past weeks more-or-less cramming a two-month training program into two and a half weeks (which Handsome Dan seemed to think was quite amusing). And definitely one sure-fire way to kick-start moving the junk-in-the-trunk. The process has dominated my conversations, but now it’s all over. I made it. 28.8.08 Filed under: waking, eating and sleeping | Posted by Louise Rollman | 28.8.08 05:24 AM
20.6.08 Filed under: waking, eating and sleeping | Posted by Louise Rollman | 20.6.08 9:31 PM ![]() Works, top to bottom: Tony Schwensen (in background), Paul Pfeiffer in Industrail Precinct at Cockatoo (x 3), Janet Cardiff & George Bures Miller, Tony Schwensen, and Nedko Solakov, originally uploaded by mxccuba. 10.6.08 Filed under: waking, eating and sleeping | Posted by Louise Rollman | 10.6.08 03:14 AM
14.4.08 Filed under: Shake and Bake | Posted by Louise Rollman | 14.4.08 9:02 PM
27.3.08 Filed under: waking, eating and sleeping | Posted by Louise Rollman | 27.3.08 4:06 PM Per the accompanying program note by Dramaturge Guy Cools, 'Sacred Monsters. Monsters Sacres. The term was used for the first time in France in the 19th century as a nickname for the big stars of the theatre, such as Sarah Bernhardt. It marks the birth of contemporary stardom in which the icons of the arts and sports world are given divine status by their audience and the media... But there is also a flip side to stardom. Having to live up to the expectations of your audience to be perfect, positive, good (at),... There is no more room for failure, imperfection, to express one's real feelihngs and emotions. The divine status becomes inhuman, monstrous.' The intense onstage collaboration between Choreographers, Dancers, Singers and Musicans becomes apparent form the initial moments. Differences in form are exhibited, namely in Akram Khan's Kathak solo, an Indian classical dance form; which if compared with Classical Ballet, it would appear that the hands dance and almost lead the complex rhythms of the feet. The performance intersects with Khan's spoken words about the early desire and struggles to represent Krishna. Later referenced in a duet when Sylvie Guillem has locked her legs around Khan's waist and the rebellious questioners' arms, and dark blue shadows, almost replicated the Indian god. Guillem's status as the super-ballerina of this era would seen unchallengeable. In an interview 'Fear is the drug' with Judith Mackrell, Guillem states, "When I am just dancing there is always something round me, a character, a role, that protects me. Here (Sacred Monsters) it feels much more myself." Through the performance, the supple Guillem twists herself into a comical knot, like Khan she exposes fears, puts herself back together and re-emerges anew. The impressive movements were interspersed with their desire to question classical inheritance, to push and challenge the conceptual boundaries of their dance forms. Questions were verbalised. What is right; what is the right movement; is this the right position or is this wrong? The processes (and exhaustion) are also literally performed when rather than exiting offstage, they sip water and towel down admist the minimal set, a torn white glacier. In its entirety, the work unpacks its self as it is performed. 20.3.08 Filed under: Shake and Bake | Posted by Louise Rollman | 20.3.08 10:29 PM
10.3.08 Filed under: waking, eating and sleeping | Posted by Louise Rollman | 10.3.08 10:12 PM
25.2.08 Filed under: waking, eating and sleeping | Posted by Louise Rollman | 25.2.08 08:43 AM
14.1.08 Filed under: waking, eating and sleeping | Posted by Louise Rollman | 14.1.08 07:28 AM
|
|
||||